iTnews Asia
  • Home
  • News
  • Government

US Appeals Court rules Meta must face class action by advertisers

US Appeals Court rules Meta must face class action by advertisers

For overcharging by fraudulently inflating the reach.

By Jonathan Stempel on Mar 22, 2024 10:30AM

A divided US appeals court said Meta Platforms must face a class action by advertisers that accused the Facebook and Instagram owner of overcharging them by fraudulently inflating the number of people their ads might reach.

In a 2-1 decision on Thursday, the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco said advertisers could sue for damages as a group over Meta's claims about the "potential reach" of their ads.

Advertisers said the metric used measured the number social media accounts, not the lower number of actual people, and inflated the number of potential viewers by as much as 400 percent.

The court also decertified a separate class seeking injunctive relief, meaning the advertisers cannot sue as a group, because it wasn't clear that the main plaintiff had legal standing to sue.

A dissenting judge would have decertified both classes. The advertisers have estimated Meta could owe more than US$7 billion (S$9.47 billion) of damages, court papers show.

Meta and its lawyers did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Class actions afford potentially greater recoveries at lower cost than if plaintiffs are forced to sue individually.

Circuit Judge Sidney Thomas wrote for the majority that because Meta provided the same alleged misrepresentation about potential reach, advertisers could try to prove that their alleged damages stemmed from a "common course of conduct."

The class covers potentially millions of individuals and businesses that have paid for ads on Facebook and Instagram since Aug 15, 2014.

Their lawsuit included a claim that senior executives knew that duplicate and fake accounts, including from bots, inflated the "potential reach" metric, but took steps to cover it up.

Circuit Judge Danielle Forrest, in a partial dissent, said she would decertify the damages class because of individualized questions about what advertisers understood about what Meta was telling them before they bought ads.

Geoffrey Graber, a lawyer for the advertisers, said he looked forward to taking the damages case to a jury.

To reach the editorial team on your feedback, story ideas and pitches, contact them here.
Copyright Reuters
© 2019 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions.
Tags:
government meta

Related Articles

  • How regenerative and responsible AI can power transformation
  • Singapore’s healthtech agency to enhance data and AI platforms
  • Singapore’s OSTIn and IMDA to develop hybrid satellite-terrestrial networks
  • Singapore’s HTX deploys air-gapped cloud to enhance AI safety for public
Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on Whatsapp Email A Friend

Most Read Articles

Singapore’s healthtech agency to enhance data and AI platforms

Singapore’s healthtech agency to enhance data and AI platforms

How regenerative and responsible AI can power transformation

How regenerative and responsible AI can power transformation

Singapore’s OSTIn and IMDA to develop hybrid satellite-terrestrial networks

Singapore’s OSTIn and IMDA to develop hybrid satellite-terrestrial networks

How badly will the trade wars impact APAC businesses and tech industry?

How badly will the trade wars impact APAC businesses and tech industry?

All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed in any form without prior authorisation.
Your use of this website constitutes acceptance of Lighthouse Independent Media's Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions.